Cincinnati AI Catalyst

← All meetings

Test Live

2026-09-01

🎬 The video recording will appear here once published.

Recap

The meeting focused on restructuring the engineering key review process and refining several core performance metrics. Eric Johnson proposed splitting the current combined review into four department-specific sessions covering Development, Quality, Security, and UX, run on a two-month rotation to prevent calendar overload while allowing deeper dives into each area. The team agreed to trial this approach with flexibility to adjust frequency based on department size and needs.

A significant portion of the discussion centered on simplifying and improving engineering KPIs. The group decided to replace the complex R&D wider MR rate metric with a straightforward percentage tracking how many total merge requests originate from the community. They also addressed data lag issues affecting February reports and Postgres replication constraints, assigning clear ownership for infrastructure updates. Finally, the team agreed to shift defect tracking from measuring closed bugs to monitoring the percentage of open bugs within SLOs, and decided to hold the narrow MR rate target steady at 10 while prioritizing quality and security improvements moving forward.

Key points

Decisions

Action items

Chapters